;

Overview image of the Impact and Exit Event.

THE IMPACT AND EXIT EVENT

An amazingly simple explanation of how a large section of today's Science

is based upon flawed information and incorrect assumptions.

 

 

 

Home

Book Synopsis

Contents

Sample text

Purchase and instantly download the e-book

Contact


 

Sample from 'Catastrophism or Uniformitarianism':

...When Alfred Wegener proposed the existence of ‘Continental Drift’ in1912, he could not conclusively explain why such huge land masses could simply ‘drift apart’. At the time the scientific community treated him with contempt, considering his proposal unrealistic. Some sources mention that he was laughed at.

However, Wegener was vindicated some 40 years later when his theory became widely accepted in the late 1950’s.

The theory of Continental Drift then became part of hypothesis relating to today’s currently (generally) accepted concept of Plate Tectonics as the driver of deformation of the Earth’s crust globally.

Unfortunately, the work that was put into enhancing the Continental Drift model to create the Plate Tectonics theory was in my opinion clearly undertaken based on flawed assumptions. Many scientists have become caught up in a self-perpetuating, erroneous circle of assumptions that have led to the incorrect Plate Tectonics theory.

In concluding that the landmasses of Earth were floating around and very, very slowly colliding with one another creating mountain ranges, seas and oceans they were wrong and I will prove it throughout the following pages.

If you are in the science of Plate Tectonics or similar I fear what lies ahead may prove difficult for you to accept. Please take a close look at the evidence I present here because it might not be all bad news: I suspect that my findings complement the original concept of seafloor spreading and Continental Drift...

 

 

Copyright © : e-Publishing Services (UK) 2010