;

Overview image of the Impact and Exit Event.

THE IMPACT AND EXIT EVENT

An amazingly simple explanation of how a large section of today's Science

is based upon flawed information and incorrect assumptions.

 

 

 

Home

Synopsis

Contents

Sample text

Instantly download the hypothesis

Contact


 

Sample from 'The after effects of the Impact and Exit Event':

...During the mid 20th century scientists who had learned of the work of Alfred Wegener unwittingly combined the anomalies created by the Impact and Exit Event with Wegener’s ‘shifting continents’ theory to eventually produce the theory of Plate Tectonics.

In the absence of any other credible explanation, the slow, unnoticeable movement of sections of the Earth’s surface around the globe appeared to be the only possible solution. How else could the mountains have been formed other than being thrust upwards by colliding continents?

The concept of Plate Tectonics was born and quickly became accepted as a viable explanation for countless millennia of mountain creation, oceanic formation and volcanic activity.

Plate Tectonics necessarily requires the movement of huge, colliding ‘Plates’ on the surface of the Earth. The colliding Plate Boundaries generated tremendous pressures, causing the uplift of mountains …and subduction back into the Earths interior.

That’s what they say.

The existence of what are normally described as ‘Plate Boundaries’ can easily be explained within my hypothesis. In fact, the ‘Plate Boundaries’ are once again a perfectly natural and entirely predictable consequence of the Impact and Exit Event.

Plate Boundaries, whether incorporated within this hypothesis or looked at in the context of Plate Tectonics are best described as a series of interconnected crustal fractures across the surface of the Earth. Some Plate Boundaries are on land and others under oceans and seas.

However, although Alfred Wegener had correctly identified that there was indeed evidence supporting his ideas pertaining to his now-famous ‘Continental Drift’ theory he could not explain the mechanics behind the drifting apart of the continents.

His findings were based on observations relating to similarities of marine life, fauna and vegetation on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean, which he believed could only have occurred if the continents were joined together at some time in the distant past.

Wegener correctly assumed that for some reason these two continents had drifted apart, creating the Atlantic Ocean, and I agree with Alfred Wegener’s conclusions entirely; continental drift did occur.

What about Plate Tectonics?

The ‘Plates’ are undoubtedly real. Clearly, Plate Tectonics does occur; separate parts of the Earths crust scour against each other. The Earth does have fractures across its surface that grind against one another causing earthquakes, and volcanic activity does occur (predominantly along these fractures).

So I agree with the concept of Plate Tectonics, insofar as there are ‘Plates’, and I support the mindset that they do grind together causing earthquakes of varying magnitudes worldwide.

The Plate Tectonics theory suggests that (for example) entire mountain ranges were (and continue to be) created over vast periods of time.

However, the Impact and Exit Event hypothesis provides substantial physical and visual evidence that supports the instant creation of the Himalayas, the Rockies, the Alps, the Pyrenees, the Andes and all other mountain ranges across our planet.

So, it is at this point that there are significant differences between Plate Tectonics and the Impact and Exit Event hypothesis. This is because there are many, many visual anomalies across the globe that can be incorporated within the Impact and Exit Event concept; anomalies that can only be viewed as short-term, catastrophic events. As such they must be removed from the realm of long-term Plate Tectonics... 

 

 

Copyright © : e-Publishing Services (UK) 2010