|
Sample
from 'The
after effects of the Impact and Exit Event':
...During
the mid 20th century scientists who had learned of
the work of Alfred Wegener unwittingly combined the anomalies created by
the Impact and Exit Event with Wegener’s ‘shifting
continents’ theory to eventually produce the theory of Plate
Tectonics.
In
the absence of any other credible explanation, the slow,
unnoticeable movement of sections of the Earth’s surface
around the globe appeared to
be the only possible solution. How else could the mountains
have been formed other than being thrust upwards by colliding
continents?
The concept of Plate Tectonics was born and quickly became
accepted as a viable explanation for countless millennia of
mountain creation, oceanic formation and volcanic activity.
Plate
Tectonics necessarily requires the movement of huge, colliding
‘Plates’ on the surface of the Earth. The colliding
Plate Boundaries generated tremendous pressures, causing the
uplift of mountains …and subduction back into the Earths
interior.
That’s
what they say.
The
existence of what are normally described as ‘Plate
Boundaries’ can easily be explained within my hypothesis. In
fact, the ‘Plate Boundaries’ are once again a perfectly
natural and entirely predictable consequence of the
Impact and Exit Event.
Plate
Boundaries, whether incorporated within this hypothesis or
looked at in the context of Plate Tectonics are best described
as a series of interconnected crustal fractures across the
surface of the Earth. Some Plate Boundaries are on land and
others under oceans and seas.
However,
although Alfred Wegener had correctly identified that there
was indeed evidence supporting his ideas pertaining to his
now-famous ‘Continental Drift’ theory he could not explain
the mechanics behind the drifting apart of the
continents.
His
findings were based on observations relating to similarities
of marine life, fauna and vegetation on opposite sides of the
Atlantic Ocean, which he believed could only have occurred if
the continents were joined together
at some time in the distant past.
Wegener
correctly assumed that for some reason these two continents
had drifted apart, creating the Atlantic Ocean, and I agree
with Alfred Wegener’s
conclusions entirely; continental drift did occur.
What
about Plate Tectonics?
The
‘Plates’ are undoubtedly real. Clearly, Plate Tectonics
does occur; separate parts of the Earths crust scour against
each other. The Earth does have fractures across its surface
that grind against one another causing earthquakes, and
volcanic activity does occur (predominantly along these
fractures).
So
I agree with the concept of Plate Tectonics, insofar as there
are ‘Plates’, and I support the mindset that they do grind
together causing earthquakes of varying magnitudes worldwide.
The
Plate Tectonics theory suggests that (for example) entire
mountain ranges were (and continue to be) created over vast
periods of time.
However,
the Impact and Exit Event hypothesis provides substantial
physical and visual evidence that supports the instant
creation of the Himalayas, the Rockies, the Alps, the
Pyrenees, the Andes and all other mountain ranges across our
planet.
So,
it is at this point that there are significant differences
between Plate Tectonics and the Impact and Exit Event
hypothesis. This is because there are many, many visual
anomalies across the globe that can be incorporated within the
Impact and Exit Event concept; anomalies that can only be
viewed as short-term, catastrophic events. As
such they must be removed from the realm of long-term Plate
Tectonics...
|